Tbilisi. Civil society organizations of Georgia evaluate the 2020 parliamentary elections. “On October 31, the parliamentary elections in Georgia were carried out with a renewed electoral system. Citizens of Georgia had the opportunity to elect a legislative body by a model close to the proportional system, which fact should be assumed as an important step forward. Despite this change, we consider that the Government of Georgia has failed to ensure conduct of the elections in accordance with democratic standards. Moreover, according to our appraisal, the 2020 parliamentary elections were the least democratic and free among those carried out within the period of governance of the “Georgian Dream””. The organizations demand to recount results of those polling stations, in protocols of which there have been detected imbalance, as well as to review submitted complaints lawfully and impartially. Read more… Source: transparency.ge

Tbilisi. Transparency International Georgia intends to challenge a proportional summary protocol of the polling station N08.10.99 of the Gldani district, as there is an imbalance of 63 votes between the number of incoming voters and votes received by parties as well as invalid ballots. “Our attention was drawn to the obvious difference between two signatures of the same member of the election commission put on a summary protocol of voting results of the polling station N08.10.99 and a correction protocol of the same polling station uploaded on the CEC website. We consider that the investigative body should get interested in the issue of different signatures of the same person on two documents and, in the circumstances of an objective investigation, determine whether or not these signatures are falsified”. Read more… Source: The website of the organization in a social network

Tbilisi. The Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association has filed 304 complaints on the polling day and in the post-election period. “The GYLA demands the invalidation of summary protocols and recounting of votes in 177 precincts. In the majority of appealed protocols, we have observed cases of imbalance and/or modification of data. The district election commissions are supposed consider to the filed complaints within two days”, is noted in the statement. Read more… Source: gyla.ge

Tbilisi. The Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association calls on the Ministry of Internal Affairs to respond effectively to facts of violence against media. “At the polling station N79 in Gldani district, a journalist of “Publika” was attacked by one of the people standing on the perimeter of the polling station. It is also noteworthy that this person confronted other media representatives too and publicly swore them”. Read more… Source:gyla.ge

Tbilisi. European Union releases the statement by the spokesperson on the parliamentary elections.  "According to the joint statement of preliminary findings and conclusions of the international observers from the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights and the Parliamentary Assemblies of the OSCE, Council of Europe and NATO, the elections were competitive and, overall, fundamental freedoms were respected. The observers noted, however, that the conduct of the elections was impacted by pervasive allegations of pressure on voters and blurring of the line between the ruling party and the state throughout the campaign and on election day, reducing public confidence in some aspects of the process". Read more… Source: eeas.europa.eu

Tbilisi. Transparency International Georgia is trying to examine all possible criticisms concerning the vote tally protocols. At this point, a review of the vote tally protocols supplied by our observers from the electoral precincts has shown that there is the so-called excessive imbalance in approximately 7% of the total number of protocols, i.e. the sum of the votes cast for electoral entities and the invalidated ballots are larger than the number of voter signatures, which should not be the case if all procedures were conducted correctly. The imbalance is significant in one-third of these cases. Read more… Source: transparency.ge

Tbilisi. The U.S. Embassy welcomes the high voter turnout during yesterday’s parliamentary elections and applauds the people of Georgia for their dedication to democracy even amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Thousands of responsible election workers and professional observation groups around the country deserve recognition and thanks for their work supporting voters’ right to be heard through the ballot box. “The U.S. Embassy shares OSCE/ODIHR’s initial assessment that “Georgia’s parliamentary elections were competitive and, overall, fundamental freedoms were respected. Nevertheless, pervasive allegations of pressure on voters and blurring of the line between the ruling party and the state reduced public confidence in some aspects of the process.” We call on all parties to address these deficiencies in advance of the second round and in future elections. These efforts to corrupt the electoral process through voter intimidation, vote buying, interfering with ballot secrecy, blurring of party and official activities, and violence against election observers and journalists, while not sufficient to invalidate the results, continue to mar Georgia’s electoral process and are unacceptable”. Read more… Source: ge.usembassy.gov

Tbilisi. The International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED) monitored the October 31, 2020 Parliamentary Elections in all electoral districts around Georgia. “According to information obtained through the PVT methodology, ISFED concludes that in the vote tabulation process there was a tendency of mismatches in the summary protocols, when the number of ballot papers cast exceeded the number of signatures in voters lists, which represents a violation. Additionally, at certain polling stations the mismatch was significantly higher than individual cases. Such violations were reported at 8% of polling stations. A tendency of this scale has not been documented in the past years, and hence, this requires particular attention. Although such tendency could have had certain influence on the results of electoral subjects, the PVT analysis shows that its maximum impact on election results would be less than 4.1%. This tendency endangers trust towards the electoral process, and requires immediate reaction from the electoral administration”, is noted in the statement. Read more… Source: isfed.ge

Tbilisi. The Public Defender’s Office was actively monitoring the parliamentary elections of October 31 within the framework of the authority granted by the legislation of Georgia. “The Public Defender of Georgia condemns the obstruction of professional activities of journalists and violent actions against them. The Public Defender explains that the Criminal Code of Georgia sets a high standard in relation to journalists’ professional activities. Thus, the Public Defender of Georgia calls on the law enforcement agencies to launch an investigation into each incident directed against journalists under Article 154 of the Criminal Code of Georgia, which pertains to unlawful obstruction of journalist's professional activities, and to take appropriate measures to identify all persons involved in the incidents”. Read more… Source: ombudsman.ge

Tbilisi. The International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED) was monitoring the October 31, 2020 Parliamentary Elections in all electoral districts around Georgia. “According to information obtained through the PVT methodology, ISFED concludes that the voting process took place mostly in compliance with the rules prescribed by the law in the majority of polling stations across Georgia. However, the secrecy of vote, inking, casting of lots, COVID-19 regulations and other procedural violations remained problematic. Facts pf physical violence and attacks against media representatives at some polling stations and in the vicinity was extremely problematic”, is noted in the statement. Read more… Source: isfed.ge

Tbilisi. Transparency International Georgia monitored the 31 October 2020 parliamentary elections with some 600 local observers. “The analysis of the 170 violations that we recorded and the 46 complaints that we filed makes it clear that the 31 October elections were a step back compared with the 2016 parliamentary elections. The election day was marked by physical confrontations outside the polling stations, obstruction of the work of observers and journalists, including physical attacks on journalists and damaging of their property, violation of the secrecy of vote in the polling stations, alleged instances of bribing of the voters, and other significant and relatively insignificant violations”, is noted in the statement. Read more… Source: transparency.ge

Tbilisi. In the opinion of the GYLA, the day of the parliamentary elections of 31 October 2020 passed with significant shortcomings at every stage of the polling day. “The tense atmosphere during the day affected both voter behavior and the monitoring of the process itself. Violence and problems related to free expression of voters’ will are among the leading characteristics of yesterday’s elections. Added to this is the disorganization of precinct election commissions (PECs), including in the area of enforcement of the rules issued to contain the pandemic”. Read more… Source: gyla.ge

Tbilisi. Transparency International Georgia (TI Georgia) will deploy 600 observers to monitor the parliamentary elections on October 31, 2020. Our static observers will cover 400 precincts throughout Tbilisi. In addition, 100 mobile groups are mobilized to observe the elections. Read more… Source: transparency.ge

Tbilisi. The Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association has been monitoring pre-election processes within the framework of the long-term observation mission and with the assistance of its 9 regional monitors in Tbilisi, Adjara, Guria, Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti, Imereti, Shida and Kvemo Kartli, Mtskheta-Mtianeti, and Kakheti. “The third interim report on the 2020 parliamentary elections covers violations revealed from October 1 to October 26 or malpractice cases. Overall, observers of GYLA revealed: - 1 case of neglect of a demand regarding separation of the state and the ruling party; - 1 case of use of administrative resources; - 2 cases of voter bribery; - 8 cases of pressure and violent acts, both alleged and confirmed; - 2 cases of obstruction of the pre-election campaign”. Read more… Source: gyla.ge

Tbilisi. Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC) publishes an assessment of visions that parties have in regard to combating homelessness. “Unfortunately, a significant part of political parties does not talk about homeless groups, other than those displaced, and specific ways to empower them”, - is stated on the website of the organization. Read more… Source: emc.org.ge

Tbilisi. Transparency International Georgia publishes an interim report on funding of the 2020 election campaign of the Parliament of Georgia. According to one of the findings, it turned out that “companies, affiliated with donors of the ruling party, won tenders worth about GEL 47 million in 2020 (before October 1), in return these donors contributed GEL 1.3 million in favor of the “Georgian Dream” during the same period. Especially noteworthy in this regard is G&K Teknologi Ltd., which won tenders worth GEL 17.2 million during the year, while Roman Abramishvili, its owner, contributed GEL 60,000 to the “Georgian Dream”. Another major state contractor is L&K Ltd., which won tenders worth GEL 8.1 million in 2020, while its owners contributed GEL 22,000 to the ruling party”. Read more… Source:transparency.ge

Tbilisi. Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC) publishes an assessment of social policy in pre-election visions of parties. “Despite the fact that labor rights are massively violated in Georgia, it can be said that this issue is not considered as a problem in pre-election programs of most political parties and, respectively, no promise or vision is proposed to voters to resolve it”, - is stated on the website of the organization. Read more… Source: emc.org.ge

Tbilisi. Transparency International Georgia, International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy, and the Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics publish a joint assessment of the pre-election environment for the 2020 parliamentary elections. “The pre-election environment as well as preparations for the Election Day have been significantly affected by the widespread of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and challenges posed by it. With the elections approaching, the number of those infected with the virus has increased dramatically, thus causing the preliminarily existing structure of the healthcare system for registration of infected and isolated people to become vague, while the attempts of the Central Election Commission, to regulate this issue via adoption of a decree two weeks prior to the elections, to appear insufficient. Besides, there have been revealed problems related to proper update of voters and correct communication with public. Due to these circumstances, the issue of exercising the right to vote of thousands of voters has been questioned”, - is stated in the joint assessment. Read more… Source: transparency.ge

Tbilisi. Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC) publishes an evaluation: Drug policy in pre-election visions of parties - 2020. “In general, it should be mentioned that in the pre-election context, the issue of drug policy is in fact ignored and public discussions about it take place rather in exceptional cases. While in pre-election programs and visions this topic is presented in a very fragmentary way”, - is stated on the website of the organization. Read more… Source: emc.org.ge

Tbilisi. As Transparency International Georgia informs, the CEC has extended the deadline for registration of self-isolated voters or those undergoing home treatment due to COVID-19 in the special portable box list until 14:00, October 27, which is appreciable, however, voters face a number of bureaucratic barriers, while the fact itself indicated defectiveness of the process. Read more… Source: The website of the organization in a social network

Tbilisi. Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC) publishes an analysis of rights of ethnic minorities in pre-election visions of parties. “Most of the publicly released programs, with the exception of those of European Georgia and Lelo, do not single out an issue of non-dominant ethnic groups as a separate article or paragraph. Analysis of pre-election programs of political parties makes it clear that parties are often unaware of needs, concerns, and challenges of non-dominant ethnic groups in depth. Pre-election programs often reveal conventional and superficial visions of parties on issues related to protection of rights of non-dominant ethnic groups and their participation in public, as well as political life. In this context, attempts of several parties, to apply different narratives and texts, are noteworthy. However, it should also be noted that their programs are fragmented and artificial”, - is stated on the website of the organization. Read more… Source: emc.org.ge

Tbilisi. On October 26, International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED) presented the II interim report on pre-election monitoring of social media in the context of the 2020 elections of the Parliament of Georgia. “Sites that promote public polarization on issues related to values are actively involved in the pre-election campaign in favor of political actors having pro-Russian disposition. 69 sites, manipulating values related topics, lead agitation in favor of the following election subjects: “Alliance of Patriots”, “Georgian March”, “Georgian Idea”, Dimitri Lortkipanidze, Director of the Primakov Foundation, a majoritarian candidate from Didube-Chugureti district, and Zviad Tomaradze, a majoritarian candidate from Gldani district. They also spread anti-liberal, anti-Western, xenophobic or homophobic sentiments. The same applies to pro-Russian narratives. Political discrediting campaigns carried out on unofficial, anonymous and fake media sites of Facebook have also been continued intensively”, - is stated on the website of the organization. Read more… Source: isfed.ge